![]() ![]() However, I realize that isn't going to happen. And usually each report comes with it's own set of verification citations that contradict each other.ĭoes anyone have a solution to this? It's been an ongoing dilemma, and it would be nice if there was one authority that everyone could agree on. ![]() I realize that the Cacti enthusiasts have become either 'lumpers' or 'splitters', and to be honest with you, it's not easy when you have one error report wanting two entries combined and then right on it's heels comes another error report wanting them split up again. Without it, we have no way of verifying/comparing the likenesses and differences. I want to acquire the New Lexicon because we are getting numerous reports that cite that book. I also have Anderson's book, which I refer to almost daily. Phil, my reason for wanting to aquire the New Lexicon is not to solely base the PlantFile entries upon it's content. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |